Can the Existence of God be Proven Ontologically Essay

Can the Existence of divinity fudge be Proven Ontologically - Essay Example oneness of such theories is the ontological argument in this paper I will argue that this hypothesis is non enough to prove the liveence of theology. The ontological argument is priori it seeks to explain the outliveence of a great existence using logic as to what the appreciative of the superior being that is paragon is. The theory was popularized by Anselm who apply psalms 14 as his reference point and addressed the fool who says in his heart that God does not exist. He offers that the fool hears and get a lines that there is a greater being although he does not understand its existence. Anselm purports that if it exists in ones understanding and then it can be made to exist in reality, which carries more weight. He clearly states that God is a being without which nothing greater exists and the fool understands this scarcely does not believe that God does truly exist. Anselms theory is more o r less ground on deduction if the fool understands that a greater being does exist then it must exist, other than he would be contradicting himself. This theory is unsatisfactory in proving Gods existence since it claims that assuming that God does not exist leads to a contradiction, He must therefore exist. The theory seems to dictate that God does exist by the virtue that He must exist, since nothing greater can be conceived than Him, it illustrates that Gods existence is necessary since the thought of Him not existing is inconceivable. The idea that the existence of God is necessary does not proof that He actually exists it is more like forcing an issue down someones pharynx and expecting that person to believe it and accept it as the truth. Because He carries the title God, the theory then seems to insinuate that it s wrong to claim that God does not exist. For something to exist, the concept must correspond to reality, but Anselms theory is based on abstract facts and this do es not proof that a greater being does exist. A monastic by the name Gaunilo, also attempted to refute the claims by Anselm describing an island that can be said to be ore excellent than any other existing island. He goes ahead to argue that an island that that exists is much better than a non-existent one, so therefore the island must exist by definition. The assumption that one can define anything that he wants and it will exist corresponds to the ontological theory. It would be therefore correct to assume that the devil also exists by the necessity that he must. Since God does exist and he is all good and presumably much greater than conceived then the devil must also exist as that which nothing worse can be conceived. This theory therefore holds no water and does not prove Gods existence since it would then show that one can imagine and assume anything in life and it shall be a reality which is not the case. Alvin Plantiga also decided to remodel the ontological argument by use of logic, claiming that concepts must each be necessary, impossible or possible. In his concepts, he claims that there is a world that possibly exists with a being that is maximally great, meaning that He exists in all possible worlds and therefore must exist in our world as well. This argument has no much difference from the Anselms argument because what it does is state that the greater being is a possibility. This claim is debatable meaning that it does not have any actual proof to support its basis. The ontological argument clearly shows that God only survives in the mind, which means if God is imagined and a creation of the mind, then something greater than God can be imagined. But one should not forget that this is all in the mind and not actually existing in real